Capital Gains Tax Considerations: Selling Investment Property vs Shares in Australia

Author: Tepuy Solutions | Date: July 2025
Category: Investment Taxation, Financial Planning

Overview

This article examines the capital gains tax (CGT) implications under Australian tax law when disposing of long-held investment property versus shareholdings. We explore the structural, timing, and ownership flexibility of each asset class, including strategic tax planning options, parcel sales, ownership restructuring, and the use of trusts. The analysis aims to inform long-term investors about optimal exit strategies that balance return maximisation with tax efficiency.

1. Introduction

Investment properties and shares are two of the most common assets held by Australian investors. While both are subject to CGT, the taxation mechanics, flexibility, and planning strategies differ significantly. The nuances of ownership structures, holding periods, partial disposals, and ability to manage taxable events shape the after-tax outcomes of each investment.

2. Capital Gains Tax Basics in Australia

3. Selling Investment Property: Tax Implications

3.1 Full vs Partial Disposal

Investment property must typically be sold in full. Partial sales are not practically viable unless the land title is subdivided, which involves council approvals, significant costs, time delays, and capital gains events on each subdivided title. Thus, investors cannot "sell part of a house" to realise a partial gain for tax smoothing.

3.2 One-Off CGT Event

Property sales create a single, large CGT event. This can push the investor into the top marginal tax bracket in the year of sale. For example, if an individual realises a $400,000 gain, $200,000 (after CGT discount) may be added to their income and taxed at rates up to 45% plus Medicare levy.

3.3 Ownership Transfers Midway: ATO Risks

Changing ownership mid-way (e.g., transferring a share to a spouse on a lower tax bracket) triggers a CGT event at the time of transfer, based on market value. No "rollover relief" exists for personal investment properties (unless under family law / divorce / death). Therefore, transferring 50% of a property to a spouse after many years does not reset ownership and may result in an immediate capital gain. Some investors use family discretionary trusts or tenants-in-common arrangements early on to split ownership and manage future tax. However, retrospective restructuring is generally ineffective or costly.

3.4 Deductions and Depreciation Recapture

Capital works and depreciation claimed over the years reduce the cost base, thus increasing the capital gain. The more depreciation claimed, the higher the gain upon sale. This makes long-term property holding slightly more tax-inefficient than it appears.

4. Selling Shares: Tax Implications

4.1 Parcel-Based Flexibility

Shares can be sold in portions (known as "parcels"), offering significant tax planning flexibility. This allows CGT gains to be spread over multiple financial years, disposal of lowest-gain or highest-cost-base parcels to reduce tax, and tactical realisation of losses to offset gains (loss harvesting). Most brokers use FIFO (first-in-first-out) by default, but the ATO allows specific identification of parcels if proper records are maintained.

4.2 CGT Discounts and Structures

Individuals receive the 50% CGT discount after 12 months. Shares held by companies pay full corporate tax (no CGT discount). Trusts can distribute capital gains and allow streaming to lower-income beneficiaries. SMSFs in accumulation phase pay 15% CGT, and 0% in pension phase (a major advantage).

4.3 Ownership Flexibility

Unlike property, shares can be easily transferred between parties or entities at market value. Transfers trigger CGT events, but can be used strategically: selling to a family trust early in the holding period, holding in superannuation for concessional CGT treatment, or structuring to allow income splitting. Moreover, shares can be gifted, inherited, or transferred more easily without disrupting the asset itself.

5. Strategic Comparison Table

FeatureInvestment PropertyShares
CGT Discount50% after 12 months50% after 12 months
Partial DisposalNot feasible (unless subdivided)Easy, parcel-by-parcel
Year-by-Year ControlNone – one-time eventYes – multi-year disposal flexibility
Ownership Change FlexibilityCostly, triggers CGTEasier to restructure
Holding in TrustsRequires careful planning from startEasier to structure
Use of SuperNot practicalCommon and tax-effective
Upfront/Exit CostsHigh (stamp duty, agent, legal, etc.)Low (brokerage only)
Cost Base ReductionsYes (via depreciation)Minimal
CGT Planning OptionsLimitedExtensive (e.g. parcel selection, timing)

6. Key Tax Planning Takeaways

7. Final Notes and Recommendations

For investors considering exiting long-held investments:

Disclaimer

This article provides general information based on current Australian taxation law (as of July 2025). It is not financial or tax advice. Investors should seek independent tax advice based on their individual circumstances.